Understanding People Isn’t Rocket Science (But It Might Save Your Sanity): A Deep Dive into Surrounded by Idiots
You know that person at work who drives you absolutely mad? The one who talks non-stop in meetings while you’re trying to get actual work done? Or maybe it’s your partner who seems incapable of making a quick decision about where to eat dinner? Here’s the thing: they’re not idiots. And neither are you. You’re just speaking different languages. Thomas Erikson’s “Surrounded by Idiots” isn’t about labelling people as stupid. It’s about understanding why we clash, miscommunicate, and sometimes want to tear our hair out when dealing with certain personality types. The book breaks down human behaviour into four colour-coded personality types based on the DISC model, and honestly, it’s like someone finally gave you the instruction manual for dealing with other humans. Let’s dive deep into this game-changing framework and, more importantly, how you can actually use it to improve your life, relationships, and sanity.The Four Colours: Your New Lens for Understanding Everyone
Erikson’s brilliance lies in his simplicity. He takes the DISC behavioural model (Dominance, Influence, Steadiness, Conscientiousness) and assigns each type a colour. It’s easier to remember “that person is very Red” than “they exhibit high dominance characteristics with low steadiness markers.”Red: The Go-Getters Who Don’t Have Time for Your Nonsense
Red personalities are your classic Type A people. They’re competitive, results-driven, and about as subtle as a sledgehammer. Reds wake up ready to conquer the world before their morning coffee. They’re the CEOs, the entrepreneurs, the people who respond to your carefully crafted three-paragraph email with a single word: “Fine.” Reds make decisions quickly, often impulsively. They value efficiency above almost everything else. Small talk? They’d rather stick needles in their eyes. Long meetings without clear action points? Torture. The upside: Reds get things done. When there’s a crisis, you want a Red in charge. They don’t freeze, they don’t panic, they act. The downside: Reds can be insensitive, impatient, and about as emotionally available as a brick wall. They bulldoze through people’s feelings in pursuit of results. They don’t mean to hurt you (usually), they just genuinely don’t notice because they’re focused on the goal.Yellow: The Life of Every Party (Even Parties They Weren’t Invited To)
Yellows are your social butterflies, your eternal optimists, your friends who turn a trip to the supermarket into an adventure. They’re enthusiastic, creative, and have more energy than should be legally allowed. Yellows thrive on interaction and novelty. They’re idea generators, often brilliant ones, though follow-through isn’t their strong suit. They’re the colleague who has seventeen amazing suggestions in a brainstorming session and forgets about all of them by the next day. The upside: Yellows make life fun. They’re persuasive, inspiring, and can sell ice to Eskimos. They bring energy and positivity to any situation. In a room full of pessimists, a Yellow will find the silver lining. The downside: Yellows can be unreliable, disorganised, and exhausting. They promise the world and sometimes deliver about 30% of it. They struggle with details, deadlines, and anything that feels boring or repetitive. They also need constant validation and attention, which can drain the people around them.Green: The Steady Rocks Who Actually Listen When You Talk
Greens are your calm, stable, genuinely nice people. They’re the friends who remember your birthday, the colleagues who actually ask how your weekend was and mean it, the partners who create warm, secure homes. Greens value harmony and relationships above all else. They’re patient, supportive, and excellent listeners. They don’t seek the spotlight; they’re happy supporting others from the background. Greens are the glue that holds teams and families together. The upside: Greens are reliable, loyal, and empathetic. They create stable, peaceful environments. They’re team players who genuinely care about everyone’s wellbeing. When you’re having a rough time, you want to talk to a Green. The downside: Greens struggle with change and conflict. They’ll say yes when they mean no to avoid confrontation. They can be passive-aggressive, holding grudges rather than addressing issues directly. Their need for stability can make them resistant to necessary changes. They also struggle to prioritise themselves, often burning out from taking care of everyone else.Blue: The Perfectionists Who’ve Already Spotted Three Errors in This Article
Blues are your detail-oriented, analytical, logical thinkers. They’re systematic, precise, and have probably already created a spreadsheet for something the rest of us haven’t even thought about yet. Blues value accuracy, quality, and proper processes. They’re the people who actually read instruction manuals, who follow recipes exactly, who want all the facts before making any decision. They’re cautious, methodical, and deeply uncomfortable with uncertainty. The upside: Blues catch mistakes everyone else misses. They create systems, maintain quality, and ensure things are done properly. In fields where precision matters (medicine, engineering, finance), Blues are invaluable. They’re also incredibly knowledgeable because they actually research things thoroughly. The downside: Blues can be rigid, critical, and slower than molasses in winter. They get paralysed by analysis, afraid to act until they have perfect information (which never exists). They can be pessimistic, always seeing potential problems. Their criticism, whilst well-intentioned, can come across as harsh and demoralising.The Reality: We’re All a Bit of Everything (But Usually More of Something)
Before we go further, here’s the crucial bit: nobody is purely one colour. We’re all combinations, though most people have one or two dominant colours that show up most strongly, especially under stress. You might be primarily Green with a solid dose of Blue, meaning you’re empathetic and detail-oriented but struggle with both confrontation and change. Or perhaps you’re Red-Yellow, a charismatic, results-driven leader who’s great at vision but terrible at patience and details. Understanding your primary colours helps you recognise your strengths and, more importantly, your blind spots. Understanding others’ colours helps you communicate effectively instead of banging your head against the wall wondering why they “just don’t get it.”The Big Misconception: It’s Not About Changing People
Here’s where most people get Erikson’s book wrong. This isn’t a manual for fixing people or turning everyone into your preferred personality type. The point isn’t to make your Yellow colleague suddenly care about spreadsheets or transform your Blue partner into a spontaneous adventurer. The point is adaptation and understanding. When you know someone is Red, you stop taking their curtness personally. When you recognise someone is Green, you understand why they need time to adjust to changes. When you grasp that someone is Blue, you stop getting frustrated by their need for detailed information. You can’t change people’s fundamental nature, but you can change how you interact with them. That’s where the real magic happens.15 Tips and Tricks to Actually Use This Stuff in Real Life
1. Identify Your Own Colour Profile First
Before you start analysing everyone else, understand yourself. Take an honest inventory of your behaviour patterns, preferences, and stress responses. How to do it: Think about your last three conflicts or frustrations with others. What bothered you? Someone being too slow and detailed? That suggests you might lean Red or Yellow. Someone being too pushy and insensitive? Might indicate Green or Blue tendencies. Real example: Sarah, a marketing director, constantly felt frustrated by her team’s “lack of enthusiasm.” After reading Erikson’s book, she realised she was strongly Yellow-Red. Her team wasn’t lacking enthusiasm; she was projecting her need for constant energy and quick action onto people who processed differently. Once she recognised this, she stopped interpreting thoughtful analysis (Blue) as negativity and quiet reliability (Green) as disengagement.2. Create a Colour Map of Your Key Relationships
Make a simple list of the important people in your life and assign them colours based on their dominant traits. This isn’t about boxing people in; it’s about having a reference point for communication. How to do it: Write down family members, close friends, key colleagues. Next to each name, note their likely dominant colour(s) and one key trait that exemplifies it. For instance: “Mum: Green-Blue, needs time to process change and detailed explanations” or “Boss: Red-Yellow, wants bottom-line results with energy.” Real example: Mike created a colour map for his family before the holidays. He identified his brother as strongly Red, his sister as Yellow, and his parents as Green. This helped him navigate difficult conversations about their ageing parents’ care. Instead of presenting his sister with a detailed 10-page care plan (which would overwhelm her Yellow nature), he started with the emotional benefits and exciting possibilities. For his Red brother, he led with the problem, the proposed solution, and the decision needed. For his Green parents, he gave them time to adjust to each idea before moving forward. What would normally be a family blow-up became a surprisingly smooth process.3. Match Your Communication Style to Their Colour
This is the single most powerful technique in the book. Stop communicating how you want to communicate and start communicating how they need to receive information. How to do it:- For Reds: Be brief, direct, and focus on results. Skip the backstory. Email them bullet points, not paragraphs.
- For Yellows: Lead with enthusiasm and the big picture. Make it interactive. Use stories and examples rather than data dumps.
- For Greens: Be warm, personal, and allow time for discussion. Don’t rush them. Show how changes affect people and relationships.
- For Blues: Provide detailed information, data, and logical reasoning. Give them time to analyse. Expect questions and prepare thorough answers.
4. Recognise Stress Colours vs. Comfortable Colours
People often shift colours under pressure. A typically Green person might become Red when stressed and feeling unheard. A Blue person might become more rigid and critical when anxious. How to do it: Pay attention to behaviour changes in your key relationships. When someone acts “unlike themselves,” consider that stress might be pushing them into a different colour expression. Don’t react to the stress colour; address the underlying concern. Real example: Tom’s normally calm, accommodating wife (Green) suddenly became demanding and critical during their house renovation. He initially responded defensively, which made things worse. Then he realised she was stressed and shifting into Red-Blue territory because she felt out of control. Instead of arguing, he involved her in decisions earlier, gave her more information about the process, and created a detailed timeline. She relaxed back into her normal Green self because her underlying need (control through information and inclusion) was met.5. Stop Taking Colour Differences Personally
Most communication breakdowns aren’t personal attacks; they’re colour clashes. The Red person isn’t being rude by cutting you off; they’re being efficient. The Blue person isn’t being difficult by asking endless questions; they’re being thorough. How to do it: When someone’s behaviour bothers you, pause and ask: “Is this a colour thing or a real issue?” If it’s a colour thing (they’re expressing their natural style), adapt. If it’s a real issue (actual disrespect or inappropriate behaviour), address it directly. Real example: Anna used to think her colleague David hated her. He rarely engaged in her friendly chat, gave terse responses, and seemed annoyed by her enthusiasm. She realised David was strongly Blue-Red, whilst she was Yellow-Green. His behaviour wasn’t personal; he was focused on work and uncomfortable with small talk. She stopped trying to force friendship and instead kept interactions brief and work-focused. Their working relationship improved dramatically. Later, David mentioned he appreciated that she “stopped trying so hard,” which he’d found exhausting. What she saw as friendliness, he experienced as intrusion.6. Build Bridges by Speaking Both Languages
In diverse teams or relationships, you’ll need to code-switch, adapting your style depending on who you’re talking to. How to do it: Practice presenting the same information in different ways. Get comfortable with different communication styles even if they don’t come naturally. Yellows, practice being more concise. Reds, practice slowing down and adding warmth. Greens, practice being more direct. Blues, practice leading with conclusions before details. Real example: Rachel was a naturally Blue project manager working with a mixed team. She started every meeting with a two-minute Red-style summary (current status, key decisions needed, timeline). Then she opened the floor for Yellow-style creative discussion. She followed up with detailed Blue-style documentation sent only to those who wanted it. She scheduled separate one-on-ones with Green team members who needed more personal attention. Her team rated her communication as excellent because everyone felt heard in their preferred style.7. Use Colour Awareness in Conflict Resolution
Most arguments aren’t about what you think they’re about. They’re often colour clashes disguised as content disagreements. How to do it: When conflict arises, step back and analyse through the colour lens. Are you fighting about the actual issue, or are you fighting because a Red wants to decide quickly and a Blue wants more time to analyse? Is the conflict about the plan itself, or is it because a Yellow wants flexibility and a Green wants stability? Real example: A couple was constantly arguing about holidays. He wanted adventure travel, she wanted relaxing beach resorts. They thought it was about destination preferences. Actually, he was Yellow (seeking novelty and excitement) and she was Green (seeking peace and recharging). Once they understood this, they compromised: they’d do adventure travel but build in proper downtime, or alternate years. The arguments stopped because they understood the underlying need, not just the surface preference.8. Hire and Build Teams with Colour Diversity
Don’t build teams of clones. You need different colours for different functions. An all-Red team will move fast but miss crucial details and burn people out. An all-Blue team will be thorough but never actually launch anything. How to do it: When building a team, intentionally seek colour diversity. Pair Reds with Blues (action with analysis). Pair Yellows with Greens (enthusiasm with stability). Create an environment where each colour’s contribution is valued. Real example: A startup was struggling despite having brilliant founders. Turns out they were both strongly Red-Yellow: all vision, energy, and action, with zero attention to systems, follow-through, or people management. They hired two people: a Blue operations manager who built systems and processes, and a Green HR person who focused on culture and team wellbeing. The company finally scaled successfully because they had the full colour spectrum covered.9. Recognise Your Colour Blind Spots
Every colour has weaknesses. The key to growth is recognising yours and actively compensating for them. How to do it: Identify your dominant colour’s typical blind spots:- Reds: You miss people’s feelings and important details. Build in pause points to check both.
- Yellows: You struggle with follow-through and details. Use systems and accountability partners.
- Greens: You avoid necessary conflicts and change. Practice directness in small doses.
- Blues: You get stuck in analysis and miss the big picture. Set decision deadlines for yourself.
10. Parent with Colour Awareness
Children have colour tendencies too, and trying to force them into your preferred colour causes unnecessary conflict. How to do it: Observe your child’s natural tendencies. Do they charge ahead (Red)? Need lots of social interaction (Yellow)? Need predictability and security (Green)? Need to understand why before they comply (Blue)? Parent to their colour, not against it. Real example: Emma had two kids: one Red-Yellow (active, social, impulsive) and one Green-Blue (cautious, thoughtful, routine-oriented). She used to parent them the same way, which failed miserably. With her Red-Yellow son, she gave clear boundaries but freedom within them, and let him expend energy through sports. With her Green-Blue daughter, she gave advance warning of changes, maintained predictable routines, and explained reasons for rules. Both kids thrived when parented according to their nature rather than against it.11. Negotiate Using Colour Intelligence
Understanding what motivates each colour gives you massive leverage in negotiations. How to do it: Identify what the other party truly values based on their colour:- Reds want to win and maintain control. Frame things as wins, respect their authority.
- Yellows want to be liked and see possibilities. Build rapport, paint exciting visions.
- Greens want harmony and security. Emphasise relationships, minimise risk, allow time.
- Blues want to be right and avoid mistakes. Provide data, show logical benefits, allow analysis time.
12. Manage Your Boss Based on Their Colour
Your boss’s colour determines what they value, how they want to receive information, and how to build a good relationship with them. How to do it: Adapt your management style to their colour. Don’t wait for them to adapt to you; you have less power in the relationship. Real example: Carlos had a strongly Blue boss who drove him crazy with constant questions and need for documentation. Carlos was Yellow-Red, preferring quick chats and intuitive decisions. He initially saw his boss as micromanaging and nitpicky. Once he understood the colour dynamic, he started providing detailed weekly reports proactively, including potential problems and his analysis of them. His boss’s “micromanaging” stopped immediately because his Blue need for information and risk assessment was being met without him having to pull it out of Carlos. Carlos got promoted six months later.13. Create Colour-Aware Meeting Structures
Meetings fail when they only suit one colour’s needs. Great meetings address all colours. How to do it:- Start with a clear agenda and expected outcomes (Blue wants structure, Red wants efficiency)
- Allow some creative discussion and relationship building (Yellow and Green need this)
- Keep things moving but allow questions (balance Red’s pace with Blue’s thoroughness)
- End with clear action items and ownership (everyone needs this, but especially Red)
- Follow up in writing (Blue needs documentation, Green needs reassurance)
14. Handle Feedback with Colour Sensitivity
How you give and receive feedback should vary by colour. One-size-fits-all feedback systems fail. How to do it:- Reds: Be direct, focus on results and improvement, don’t overly pad criticism.
- Yellows: Balance criticism with positivity, focus on future possibilities, keep it interactive.
- Greens: Be gentle, private, and supportive. Give time to process. Emphasise your continued support.
- Blues: Be specific with examples and data. Focus on quality and improvement. Allow them to respond with their analysis.
15. Build Self-Awareness Through Colour Reflection
The deepest benefit of this framework is holding up a mirror to your own patterns and biases. How to do it: Regularly journal or reflect on interactions through the colour lens. When something goes wrong, analyse it: Did I communicate in my preferred style instead of theirs? Did I judge their colour negatively instead of adapting? What could I do differently next time? Real example: David kept a “colour journal” for a month, noting every significant interaction and analysing it through the colour framework. He discovered he was strongly Yellow with Red tendencies and had a massive blind spot around Green personalities, whom he found “too slow and passive.” This was affecting his marriage (Green wife) and his relationship with two team members (both Green). Recognising this bias was the first step to changing it. He started intentionally valuing Green qualities (stability, thoughtfulness, loyalty) rather than seeing them through his Yellow-Red lens as weaknesses. His relationships improved dramatically simply from this shift in perspective.The Darker Side: When Colours Go Toxic
Here’s what Erikson addresses but some readers miss: every colour has a shadow side that emerges under stress, insecurity, or poor character. Toxic Red: The bully. The person who uses their dominance to control and demean rather than lead. They crush people beneath them and create cultures of fear. Toxic Yellow: The narcissist. The person who needs constant attention and validation, manipulating others emotionally to get it. They promise everything, deliver nothing, and blame everyone else. Toxic Green: The martyr. The person who says yes to everything, then becomes passive-aggressive and resentful. They play victim and use guilt to manipulate. Toxic Blue: The rigid perfectionist. The person whose need for correctness becomes paralysing criticism of everything and everyone. They use their intelligence as a weapon. The colour framework isn’t an excuse for bad behaviour. A Red boss’s curtness might be understandable, but screaming at employees isn’t. A Yellow colleague’s disorganisation might be their nature, but consistently dumping work on others at the last minute isn’t acceptable. Use the framework to understand and adapt, but maintain boundaries around genuinely problematic behaviour.Why This Framework Changes Everything (If You Actually Use It)
Most personality frameworks stay theoretical. You take the test, get your type, say “Oh, that’s interesting,” and then nothing changes. Erikson’s brilliance is in the practical application. The colour framework is simple enough to remember and use in real time. When your Red boss sends you a curt email, you can recognise it as Red communication rather than personal criticism. When your Yellow friend cancels plans again, you can recognise it as Yellow unreliability rather than them not valuing you. When your Green partner needs three days to decide on something you find simple, you can recognise it as Green processing rather than them being difficult. This framework doesn’t just help you understand people better. It helps you respond better. And that changes everything. Most relationship problems aren’t actually about the content of the conflict. They’re about mismatched communication styles and unmet needs. When a Red and a Green clash, it’s usually not about the decision itself. It’s about the Red wanting to decide quickly and the Green needing time to process. When a Yellow and a Blue clash, it’s not about the project. It’s about the Yellow wanting flexibility and the Blue wanting detailed planning. Once you see the pattern, you can stop having the same pointless arguments and actually address the underlying dynamic.The Uncomfortable Truth About “Idiots”
Here’s Erikson’s provocative title explained: everyone else seems like an idiot when they don’t operate the way you think they should. Reds think Greens are idiots for being so slow and passive. Greens think Reds are idiots for being so insensitive and reckless. Yellows think Blues are idiots for being so negative and rigid. Blues think Yellows are idiots for being so scattered and superficial. We’re not surrounded by idiots. We’re surrounded by people operating from different colour frameworks, and we haven’t learned to translate between them. The person who drives you mad at work isn’t stupid. They’re smart in a different way than you are. The family member you can’t understand isn’t impossible. They’re communicating in a different language than you speak. Learning to translate between colours is like learning a new language. It’s awkward at first. You’ll make mistakes. You’ll accidentally offend Blues by being too casual or overwhelm Greens by pushing too hard. But like any language, it gets easier with practice. And the payoff is enormous. Better relationships, less conflict, more effective communication, and a lot less frustration.Practical Implementation: Your 30-Day Colour Challenge
Reading about this is one thing. Actually using it is another. Here’s a practical 30-day challenge to embed this framework into your life: Week 1 – Observation: Don’t try to change anything. Just observe and identify. Make notes about the people in your life and their likely colours. Notice your own colour preferences and biases. Week 2 – Adaptation: Pick one relationship that’s challenging and consciously adapt your communication to their colour for one week. Notice what changes. Week 3 – Expansion: Apply colour adaptation to three more relationships: one at work, one in family, one in friendship. Practice switching between different communication styles. Week 4 – Integration: Start using colour awareness automatically. Notice your stress colour. Catch yourself making colour-based judgments. Use the framework to resolve conflicts as they arise. After 30 days, this stops being a technique you use and becomes a lens through which you naturally see the world.The Limits of the Framework (Because Nothing’s Perfect)
Before we wrap up, let’s be honest about what this framework can’t do: It can’t fix serious relationship problems rooted in incompatibility, abuse, or toxic behaviour. Colour awareness might help you understand why someone behaves poorly, but it doesn’t obligate you to tolerate it. It can’t replace actual communication. You still need to talk to people, ask questions, and verify your assumptions. The colour framework is a hypothesis generator, not a mind-reading tool. It can’t account for cultural differences, neurodiversity, or individual trauma. Someone’s behaviour might look like a colour preference but actually be a cultural norm or a trauma response. Always hold your colour assessments lightly. It can’t make you compatible with everyone. Some colour combinations are naturally more challenging. Red-Green relationships require more work than Red-Red ones. That doesn’t make them impossible, but it does mean you need realistic expectations. It doesn’t explain everything. People are complex. Sometimes someone is just having a bad day. Sometimes there’s a legitimate issue that has nothing to do with personality colours. Don’t use this framework to avoid dealing with real problems. Use the framework as a tool, not a religion. It’s incredibly useful, but it’s not the only lens you need for understanding human behaviour.Final Thoughts: From Frustration to Understanding
The real gift of “Surrounded by Idiots” isn’t the colour framework itself. It’s the shift from judgment to curiosity. Before understanding this framework, you probably judged people who operated differently than you. Too slow, too fast, too emotional, too cold, too scattered, too rigid. After understanding this framework, you can get curious instead: What colour are they? What do they need? How can I communicate in a way they’ll hear? This shift from judgment to curiosity is transformative. It reduces conflict, increases empathy, and makes you significantly more effective in every relationship. You’ll still get frustrated sometimes. You’re human. Your Green partner’s need for lengthy processing will still occasionally drive your Red-Yellow self up the wall. Your Blue colleague’s endless questions will still test your patience. But instead of stewing in frustration or taking it personally, you’ll understand what’s happening. You’ll see the colour dynamic, adapt your approach, and move forward more effectively. That’s the real value of Erikson’s work. Not perfection, but understanding. Not changing people, but learning to work with them as they are. Because at the end of the day, we’re not surrounded by idiots. We’re surrounded by people who see the world differently than we do. And once you learn to speak their language, life gets a whole lot easier.Unlock More Secrets on Mind Set in Stone Podcast 🎙️
Want to dive even deeper into the fascinating world of personality types, communication, and human behaviour? Tune into the Mind Set in Stone Podcast! We break down books like Surrounded by Idiots and explore practical ways to apply their principles to your relationships, career, and personal growth. It’s insightful, entertaining, and designed to help you understand people better (and maybe understand yourself a bit more too). Listen now on Spotify, Apple Music, and YouTube to start transforming how you interact with the world!📚 Grab the Book & Support the Blog post
Looking to dive deeper into the book we featured? You can purchase it through our Amazon affiliate link — it won’t cost you anything extra, but it helps support the Mind Set In Stone podcast so we can keep bringing you inspiring content. Thank you for your support! https://amzn.to/48qOuYuTest Your Surrounded by Idiots Knowledge: 15-Question Quiz
How well did you absorb the colour framework? Take this quiz to find out! 1. What colour represents the dominant, results-driven personality type?- a) Red
- b) Yellow
- c) Green
- d) Blue
- a) Red
- b) Yellow
- c) Green
- d) Blue
- a) Being too aggressive
- b) Lacking attention to detail
- c) Avoiding conflict and change
- d) Being overly critical
- a) Social interaction
- b) Quick decisions
- c) Accuracy and detailed information
- d) Emotional support
- a) That everyone is just one colour
- b) That it’s about changing people
- c) That colours can’t work together
- d) That it only applies to work settings
- a) Provide extensive detail and background information
- b) Be brief, direct, and focus on results
- c) Build rapport through small talk first
- d) Give them several days to make a decision
- a) They disappear completely
- b) They often shift to different colour expressions
- c) They become more balanced
- d) They stay exactly the same
- a) Red-Red
- b) Yellow-Yellow
- c) Red-Green
- d) Blue-Blue
- a) The bully
- b) The narcissist
- c) The martyr
- d) The rigid perfectionist
- a) All Red personalities for speed
- b) All Blue personalities for accuracy
- c) Colour diversity
- d) Only two colours maximum
- a) Be direct and quick
- b) Focus on problems first
- c) Be gentle, private, and supportive
- d) Use data and specific examples only
- a) A tool, not a religion
- b) A replacement for all communication
- c) A way to judge people
- d) A mind-reading technique
- a) Red
- b) Yellow
- c) Green
- d) Blue
- a) Most people are actually unintelligent
- b) Everyone else seems like an idiot when they don’t operate the way you think they should
- c) Only certain colours are intelligent
- d) Idiots are everywhere and unavoidable
- a) Immediately start telling people their colours
- b) Identify your own colour profile first
- c) Force everyone to take a colour test
- d) Change your entire personality
Quiz Answers
1. Answer: a) Red – Red represents the dominant, results-driven personality type who values efficiency and quick action. 2. Answer: b) Yellow – Yellow personalities are social butterflies, enthusiastic, and thrive on interaction and novelty. 3. Answer: c) Avoiding conflict and change – Greens struggle with confrontation and resist change, often saying yes when they mean no to maintain harmony. 4. Answer: c) Accuracy and detailed information – Blues are analytical and systematic, requiring thorough information before making decisions. 5. Answer: b) That it’s about changing people – The framework is about understanding and adapting your communication, not fixing or changing others. 6. Answer: b) Be brief, direct, and focus on results – Reds value efficiency and want the bottom line without unnecessary detail or small talk. 7. Answer: b) They often shift to different colour expressions – Under stress, people can express colours differently than their comfortable state. A Green might become Red when feeling unheard. 8. Answer: c) Red-Green – These opposite types (fast-paced vs. steady, direct vs. harmonious) require more conscious effort to work together effectively. 9. Answer: b) The narcissist – Toxic Yellows need constant attention and validation, manipulating others emotionally while promising everything and delivering nothing. 10. Answer: c) Colour diversity – Effective teams need different colours for different functions. All-Red teams move fast but miss details; all-Blue teams are thorough but slow to launch. 11. Answer: c) Be gentle, private, and supportive – Greens need reassurance and time to process feedback in a safe, private environment with emphasis on continued support. 12. Answer: a) A tool, not a religion – The framework is incredibly useful but isn’t the only lens needed for understanding human behaviour. Hold assessments lightly. 13. Answer: d) Blue – Blues can get stuck in analysis paralysis, afraid to act until they have perfect information (which never exists). 14. Answer: b) Everyone else seems like an idiot when they don’t operate the way you think they should – We’re not surrounded by idiots; we’re surrounded by people operating from different colour frameworks who we haven’t learned to translate. 15. Answer: b) Identify your own colour profile first – Understanding yourself and your biases is the crucial first step before analysing others.How did you score?
- 13-15 correct: Colour master! You’ve truly grasped the framework and are ready to transform your relationships.
- 10-12 correct: Solid understanding! A bit more practice and you’ll be fluent in all four colours.
- 7-9 correct: Good start! Go back and review the sections on colours you’re less familiar with.
- 4-6 correct: Time for a re-read! The framework takes practice to fully absorb.
- 0-3 correct: No worries! This stuff takes time. Consider listening to the Mind Set in Stone Podcast for reinforcement!